Commentary - Humor - Nonsense - Sarcasm - Satire - Whimsy

SPECIAL EDITION

The Best of: On the Road with DR. EVIL

From Vol. V, Nos. 1 - 12, 2003

 

REST IN PURGATORY, DUDE.

Home                                         Contact Dr. Evil

January 1, 2004

A Missive of Irregular Frequency and Questionable Worth

SORRY, WRONG NUMBER

Mrs. Evil recently discovered that we were out of popcorn rice.  Now, Popcorn Rice is the greatest rice there is.  We were first introduced to it in New Orleans. In agreement with its name, when cooked, it smells just like popcorn.   Unfortunately, it is not available in our area. She had just made some seafood gumbo with Andouille sausage and put it in the freezer for an upcoming family gathering. She attempted to telephone La Cuisine Classique, the store in the French Quarter where she had shopped for popcorn rice some years ago.   The gentleman who answered the phone informed her that, unfortunately, she had the wrong number.  After verifying with him that, indeed, he lived in the New Orleans area, Mrs. Evil asked him if he would be so kind as to look up the correct number for her. After a short period of uncertain silence, the man responded with, "I'm sorry, Darlin', I'm in the middle of having sex right now."  Without missing a beat, Mrs. Evil came right back with, "Well, far be it from me to interrupt something so important as that." After searching on Google.com, she was able to find and order her popcorn rice. Fortunately, Mr. Google wasn't similarly engaged.

A FRIGHTENING DISCONNECT

 I feel it is appropriate to offer a quote from David Broder's op-ed piece, A Lump of Coal From the President, December 4, 2002. It is as follows: "As my friend, columnist Mark Shields, pointed out recently, when Congress authorized the use of force in Iraq, not a single member of the House and only one senator had a son or daughter serving in the enlisted ranks of the armed services. And only three House members have children who are officers." 

We're talking about 100 members of the Senate and 415 in the House - that's 515 men and women, most of whom are parents - and George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Andrew Card, Carl Rove, etc. etc.  The disconnect is frightening.   

Ironically, the only high ranking moderating voice is that of a former Army general, now Secretary of State, Colin Powell.

IN MEMORIAL

In view of the Columbia tragedy on 1 February, it is not fitting to issue this month's edition of Dr. Evil's brand of inconsequentia as though it was just another day. So, consider this a moment of silence in remembrance of these seven astronauts who, thinking they were at the end of a successful flight, met such horrendous and terrible deaths. 

They were:

Rick D. Husband, Colonel, U.S. Air Force, Commander
William C. McCool, Commander, U.S. Navy, Pilot
David M. Brown, Captain, U.S. Navy, Mission Specialist
Laurel B. Clark, Commander, U.S. Navy, Mission Specialist
Kalpana Chawla, Aerospace Engineer, Mission Specialist
Michael P. Anderson, Lt. Colonel, U.S. Air Force, Payload Commander
Ilan Ramon, Colonel, Israeli Air Force, Payload Specialist


Scott Stantis, AL, The Birmingham News

THE AMERICAN GLADIATOR

Some weeks ago, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeldius Gluteus Maximus Pompositus,* railed mightily against re-instituting the draft because, in his opinion, draftees are undesirable military prospects - not as dedicated, intelligent, etc. as volunteers - and the equipment used by today's military is too advanced for them. 

I was drafted into the Army during the final stages of the Korean "conflict." I suppose the only stupid thing about it was allowing myself to be drafted in the first place. I had been offered a permanent deferment if I would accept a teaching position in Frankfort, Ky. After basic training, I was assigned to the 5th Cavalry Regiment of the 1st Cavalry Division in Camp Chitose, Hokkaido, Japan, right after it had been decimated by the Chinese army and was withdrawn from the Korean peninsula. 

The only day-to-day difference between RAs (Regular Army volunteers) and USs (Draftees) that I noticed was that more of the RAs were drunks and were, for that and other reasons, usually under company punishment and restricted to the company area.  Also, as company clerk, I expended much of my prowess with the typewriter, such as it was, in preparing the paperwork for undesirable discharges and Summary and Special Courts Martial against various RAs. None, that I remember, against USs. 

Since no one in the upper echelon of this Republican administration has served on active duty in the military, I fear that they not speaketh with first-hand knowledge regarding draftees. Such an attitude is unforgivable. Our military suffered 291,557 battle deaths in World War II, 33,686 in Korea and 47,410 in S.E. Asia, a total of 372,653 in these three wars.** The total non-mortal woundings for all of these conflicts was 1,687,877.  Grand total battle deaths and non-mortal woundings, 2,060,530 - as many as 70% of whom were draftees. 

I'm sure that the millions of mothers, fathers, husbands, wives, children, brothers, and sisters are comforted by that kind of attitude. Yeh, sure!

* A take-off of a similar moniker given him by Maureen Dowd, in her op-ed piece, "Much to be learned from ancient empires," Dayton Daily, March 6, 2003. 

** Source of statistics: http://www.hadit.com/library/statistics/americaswars.htm 

IT'S MARTINI TIME

What is a martini?

Webster defines it "dryly" as follows: "mar-ti-ni \ mär'tēnē, må'-, -ni \ also martini cocktail n -s sometimes cap M [prob. fr. the name Martini]: a cocktail consisting of two or more parts gin to one of dry vermouth usu. stirred with ice and garnished with an olive, pearl onion, or slice of lemon peel." 

But it's not quite that simple. 

Between 1966 and 1975, Webster became a heretic when, in an attempt to appeal to the college crowd, he added "also: one made with vodka instead of gin." 

Barnaby Conrad III says this: "You might make a drink, made with Vodka, but it's NOT a Martini. Only Gin can make a Martini!"

Winston Churchill drank his Martinis with gin only, and a twist of lemon. He bowed to France in honor of the absent vermouth. Alfred Hitchcock preferred his gin uncluttered by the taste of vermouth. Instead, he would tap the side of the shaker with the vermouth bottle. 

Purists drink theirs "straight up." I guess I'm not a purist.

Satirical poet and short-story writer, Dorothy Parker, wrote the following about Martinis.

I like to have a Martini
Two at the very most --
After three I'm under the table,
After four I'm under my host. 

Historically, I've preferred the conventional 2 to 1 gin to vermouth (with an extra olive for Mrs. Evil) over a few rocks. Lately, though, I have joined up with Churchill and Hitchcock and frequently deleted the vermouth. I have found that the addition of a few drops of Pernod, Frangelico, Sambvca Romana, or Grand Marnier is quite tasty. 

But, I digress. 

The Plymouth Gin web site includes the following:

 Ode to the Martini.

"The Horse and Mule live thirty years
And nothing know of wines or beers.
The Goat and Sheep at twenty die,
But never tasted Scotch or Rye
.
The Cow drinks water by the ton
And at eighteen is almost done.

The Dog at fifteen cashes in,
Without the aid of Rum or Gin.
The Cat in milk and water soaks,
And then in twelve short years it croaks.
The useful, sober bone-dry hen,
Lays eggs for Nogs and dies at ten.

All animals are strictly dry,
Teetotal live and quickly die,
But sinful Plymouth
Gin-full men,
Survive for
three score years and ten.
And some of us (though mighty few),
Stay pickled till we're ninety-two. "

Barnaby Conrad III allows as how,

"One Martini is not enough. 
Two Martinis is too much. 
Three Martinis is not enough."

Huh?

Then there's the Medicinal Martini, the one I have at 5 or 5:30 some afternoons to delete the aches and pains in my old body after a day of greater-than-usual physical activity. But to qualify as "medicinal" it must be at least 5 to 1 - and no drops of liqueur. They are life savers. They make the labor worthwhile.

Sources: Webster's 1966 Third New International Dictionary, and the1975 New Collegiate Dictionary, both published by G. & C. Merriam Co.: www.plymouthgin.com: The Cocktail Book - A Sideboard for Gentlemen, Neill and Co., Edinburgh: The Martini, by Barnaby Conrad III.

AN OFFER EVEN I FOUND EASY TO REFUSE

I recently turned down an offer to make a cool $3,300,000. It came in the form of an e-mail from a Mr. Henry Ugwumba. As detailed in his message, Henry proposed to enter into a business relationship with me. He says he is 16 years of age, the only child of a businessman from the Ivory Coast. His mom and pop are deceased. His pop was a highly successful cocoa merchant who was poisoned by his business associate. Before dad died, he drew Henry to his bedside and informed him of his riches and that he, Henry, was to receive all his fortune, a sum of $16,500,000. The dough was supposedly in a "suspense" account in a bank in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso*, and that Henry should seek a foreign partner in a country of his choice to whom he would transfer the money and, later, use if for investment purposes.

Naturally, with my internationally known reputation for greed and evil, it was not difficult to find and select me as a potential business partner. All he asked of me was to, 1) provide a bank account to where this money could be transferred, 2) serve as the guardian of his fortune, since Henry was under age, and 3) make arrangements for Henry to come to the United States after the money has been transferred. For this he would award me 20% of the total loot, that's $3,300,000, as my commission. The whole thing could be concluded within seven days after I signify my interest in helping him. I had the option of corresponding with him via his e-mail address or his telephone number.

Realizing that it was a scam, I sent the gist of the e-mail to the FBI. They quickly got back to me and recommended that I fax a copy of the message to the Secret Service. In addition they sent me the skinny on operations of this sort. They are fascinating. You can see what they have to say at http://www.secretservice.gov/alert419.shtml

I searched out the the web site of the U.S. Embassy in Burkina Faso. On its Financial Fraud Warning Page I found the following: "Did you get a letter or an e-mail from a bank or brokerage firm that sounds too good to be true, chances are it is a scam. We have seen dozens of victims who have been promised part of a fortune from a deceased person's accounts."

So fraud must be big time business in Burkina Faso.

* Burkina Faso is a small landlocked country in the middle of the "hump" of Africa. Ouagadougou is its capital. 

WHAT YOU GOT IN THAT NEEDLE, DUDE?

The Soviets spent a lot of time and money attempting to weaponize it. Now it turns out that North Korea, Syria, Iran, and Iraq are thought to have been successful in weaponizing it. U.N. inspectors were told by Iraqi authorities that they had produced 19,000 liters (that's 4,950 gallons) of it - said to be enough to kill every person on Earth, three times over. 

Now, the population of Earth in 2002 was about 5,970,000,000 (5.970 billion). Three time that is 17,910,000,000 (17.910 billion). 

4950 gallons equals 633,600 ounces. Therefore, it would take only 0.0000353 ounces to produce a fatal dose for each of 17.910 billion people. 

How much is 0.0000353 ounces? 

Well, according to my medical dictionary, one drop of water equals 1/60 fluidrachms. One fluidrachm equals 1/8 fluid ounce. So, there would be about 480 drops in an ounce of water. That means that 1 drop is equal to 0.0020833 ounces. Divide 0.0020833 by 0.0000353 and you get 59 (plus a small fraction) people PER DROP. So, it would take about 1/59th of a drop to kill each person. 

What is it? It's Botox - that stuff that's produced by the bacterium Clostridium Botulinum. "It is the most poisonous substance known to man," says the Center for Civilian Biodefense Strategies at Johns Hopkins University. Because of its high toxicity, its prevalence, and the long term medical care required for anyone poisoned with it, it is a very effective biological weapon. 

In an ad promoting Botox as a safe, temporary cosmetic cure for wrinkles and frowns, it is described as a “natural protein.”*

Really fun stuff. Anyone for a Botox Party?

* http://www.botoxcosmetics.com

CARTOONS ARE FOR KIDS?

During the past 2 weeks Mrs. Evil and I have been entertaining our two youngest grandchildren, ages 9 and 10. Being kids, and with 6 TVs in our house, channel 40, The Cartoon Network, could not help but experience some exposure. Now, even at age 75, I still appreciate a good cartoon, but 90 percent of the stuff available on this channel I consider totally uninteresting. Obviously, however, I'm missing something. Just look at the sponsors and you'll understand. In great part, they are obviously NOT aimed at the pre-teen viewer, unless these youngsters are suddenly having run-ins with the IRS or are considering refinancing their homes. 

During the few hours I forced myself to watch it, there appeared successive ads obviously aimed at adults - or at least those adult in body size. It's a toss-up as  to which is the more memorable or disgusting. One featured the obnoxious Roni Deutch, the renowned tax law guru, offering the opportunity to take on the IRS "for just $20." The other featured DiTech, and the persistent offer to put you on financial easy street. You know, featuring loans in which you pay a relatively low interest rate for the first 3 years, after which there is a balloon that carries a rate of 13.4% - or, after 3 years, offers a reduced rate as well as monthly payment, but takes an additional 40 years to pay off and on which you pay twice as much total interest.

Then, forcing myself to continue watching over the course of the next several days, there were ads for Queens of Country (2 CDs or 2 Cassettes of the best in country music - only $19.95), H&R Block Mortgage, Sports on Demand from Time-Warner Cable, Worship Together, The Best of Modern Worship (2 CDs or 2 Cassettes, but for only $9.95), Sandals Royal Bahamian Resort, Freaky Friday the movie, and AOL/Time Warner.

Fortunately, there were some ads for kids, like Kit Kat candy bars, Cinnamon Toast Crunch, Reese's Peanut Butter Cups, Zoobooks, Skechers Shoes, and Huggies - although Huggies should probably be listed in the previous paragraph.  

While conducting this research, I of course had to force myself to spend a lot of time looking at The Cartoon Network. I take that back. I'm not really 75.

ADS FOUND AT STATE LINES

 Mrs. Evil and I rather frequently have reason to drive to or through Kentucky, Tennessee, Georgia, South Carolina and/or Florida as well as Indiana and Illinois. As one approaches the state lines of some of the above states, billboards take on a sudden change in character. Wendy's, Cracker Barrel, and Pancake House are still prominent, but a new class of, usually garishly, repetitive, homemade appearing signs appear, advertising the likes of: "Mad Max's Firecrackers Next Exit," "Topless Lap Dancer Extravaganza 2 Miles," or "Adult Books and Videos Exit 1." Because they are concentrated at state lines, I assume they are primarily intended for travelers from the adjacent state returning home or residents of the host state intending to corrupt the souls of citizens of the adjacent state. Does that mean that such treats are not available in the adjacent state? Then too, you never see them  scattered throughout the host state - only near the state line. Does this mean that a guy has to travel from some distant part of Kentucky, say, all the way to the state line to buy a girly movie or some sparklers and bottle rockets? 

You figure it out.

PERSONS OF INTEREST! JUST SHORT OF AMERICA'S MOST WANTED?

Gee! Ordinarily, I should think that a person would feel flattered if he or she is thought of as a “person of interest.” Wouldn’t that be the same as an “interesting person?”

No, I’m afraid not.

It isn’t in Webster’s New International Dictionary as yet, but I expect it will be soon.  

The term was first used by the Justice Department when referring to Steven J. Hatfill, former U.S. Army bioweapons scientist after the 2001 anthrax attacks. Although never officially labeled a “suspect,” he has been fired by the Louisiana State University’s biomedical research and training center after an e-mail was sent by the Justice Department, ordering them to “immediately cease and desist” from employing him on department-funded programs. No reason was given.

The term has been applied to many “not-quite-suspects” since then, including a University of New Hampshire student who might know something about “Jack the Snipper.” Jack, it would seem likes to cut the clothes off of young women while they're sleeping. If he’s just a "person of interest," (wink wink) police are shielded from embarrassment in the event they end up arresting someone else. 

It appears to have been instituted to avoid lawsuits such as those filed by exonerated 1996 Olympic bombing suspect Richard Jewell. He was investigated by the FBI after he spotted a backpack that held a bomb that subsequently exploded. He rushed bystanders away from the area just in time. The FBI "accused" him of trying to attract attention. Somehow, they just could not bring themselves to believe that he was acting responsibly.

By the way, in a weird twist to the Hatfill case, Bill O’Reilly and Fox News have sued him for what has been called a "breach of implied contract." Because he held himself out to the public and to the media as probably being guilty, “Dr. Hatfill has stood by and reaped all the benefits and related rights and privileges of a celebrity crime suspect. He got his name in the papers and his picture on TV night after night, all while offering only the mildest protestations of innocence.” * In other words, in the opinion of O'Reilly and Fox News, he led them on, causing them to believe he really was guilty since he did not protest enough, and by doing so, did not provide Fox New with enough press.

In another twist, I see that John Ashcroft has been listed as a “person of interest” in the much more serious case of the missing Bill of Rights.  

*Disassociated Press, Washington , Aug. 27, 2003.  

Questionaire: Are You Considered a Person of Interest by a Law Enforcement Agency?

1. Has your Mayoral office been bugged lately?
2. Have you criticized the Iraq War?
3. Do you wear heightening shoes?
4. Have you ever bought a one-way airline ticket?
5. Are you a regular reader of "On the Road with Dr. Evil?"

DR. AND MRS. EVIL WISH YOU ALL A HAPPY AND PROSPEROUS NEW YEAR. 

See you at the next rest stop.

Dr. Evil

Why yes! I'm Evil.

Top of Page

Home - Visit the Rest of Volume V